The framers did the best within their abilities to provide a plan that would best ensure the happiness of the American people. Even if the convention was unauthorized, that does not mean that the states should not take the good advice of the delegates to the convention. Each of the powers delegated to congress under the U. Constitution originate with the people themselves, are checked by the authority of other branches of government, or can be checked by the state governments.
The powers delegated to the central government will best maintain the individual liberty of the citizens by providing for unified and enforced regulations and guidelines.
Plus, the state governments retain a large portion of their sovereignty under the new form of government, which is dependent on the state governments for its elections and its membership in the Senate. The state governments will always collectively overpower the central government due to the sheer number of state officials, and to the close connection of the people to their local governments.
The state and federal governments are not competing for power, but designed to effectively work together in protecting the common good. The state governments are responsible for internal affairs, and the federal for external affairs. They have the mutual authority to check the power of the other, through the power of the people. This will especially protect the state governments from usurpations of power by the federal government.
The division of the federal government into three distinct branches, each with the authority to effectively check the power of the others will also ensure the best protection of individual liberty.
Although critics claim that a mixing of powers will potentially lead to all the powers amassed in one branch, the subdivision of authority on two levels, state and federal, provides a double protection for the rights of the people. Therefore a large Republic will defeat the will of a faction if it is detrimental to the whole because of the merit of the representatives, the founders thought. Party Unity at the Congressional level will defeat our form of representative government as it did with Obamacare.
If representatives vote with the party interests over the interests of the people then a representative form of government will fail in the protection of the liberty of the people. If our representatives, House and Senate, are of the people, meaning one of us, by the people, meaning elected by us, and for the Party instead of for the people, then our country may indeed perish from this earth.
There is nothing in the constitution preventing this behavior nor should there be. It is this form of Party Politics that is wrong, not the constitution, and it should be disgraced and every politician behaving this way should be shamed and ridiculed until it stops. We are beginning to see some hope with the representatives that have been elected to uphold Tea Party principles turning against their party leaders when necessary to vote for the people.
Federalist Papers Summaries Index Page. Read The Federalist Papers No. Federalist Papers Summary No. Fire can't burn without that pesky oxygen pesky freedom, in this analogy , but you also need oxygen to breathe. What gets even worse is that everyone has an interest. A creditor and a debtor would have vastly different opinions about the economy, and so would a farmer versus a manufacturer. People also tend to support things that benefit themselves, and in a democracy there's nothing really stopping the biggest faction from calling the shots.
An example of self-interest in government is setting taxes. A government has to set taxes to function, but when it's deciding how much money to take for itself, there's always the temptation to skim a little extra off the top. So, that's a no-go on cause-preventing. But luckily, we can cut down on the worst effects of Factions by governing.
By changing the US to a Representative Democracy, big potentially dangerous ideas get filtered down into a smaller set of trained government officials, who will take them and use their best judgment on them. Representatives also can be corrupt, so this system hopefully keeps those people in check by cutting down their influence.
The Federalist Papers study guide contains a biography of Alexander Hamilton, John Jay and James Madison, literature essays, a complete e-text, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.
A short summary of The Founding Fathers's The Federalist Papers (). This free synopsis covers all the crucial plot points of The Federalist Papers ().
The Federalist Summary No Madison November 22, This paper is considered an important document in American history for it lays out how the writers of the constitution defined the form of government that would protect minority rights from organized and united factions that intended to pass legislation injurious to the liberty of the minority or detrimental to the good of the country. A summary of Federalist Essays No - No in The Founding Fathers's The Federalist Papers (). Learn exactly what happened in this chapter, scene, or section of The Federalist Papers () and what it means. Perfect for acing essays, tests, .
Get free homework help on The Federalist: book summary, chapter summary and analysis and original text, quotes, essays, and character analysis courtesy of CliffsNotes. First published in , The Federalist is a collection of 85 newspaper articles, written by the mysterious Publius, that argued swift ratification of the U.S. Constitution. Federalist No. 10 is an essay written by James Madison as the tenth of The Federalist Papers: a series of essays initiated by Alexander Hamilton arguing for the ratification of the United States Constitution.