The introduction of laws addressing same-sex marriage continues to vary across various jurisdictions as there are various accomplishments which are managed through distinctive legislative changes onto various marriage laws as well as court rulings which are on the basis of constitutional guarantees in terms of equality and through direct popularity of votes through ballot initiatives and referendums.
Having to allow same-gender couples to engage in legal marriages can be considered to be a very critical rights issue. Such an introduction of same-sex marriage continues to vary in terms of jurisdiction which will in turn result from the due legislative changes for most marriage laws, as well as court challenges which are on the basis of constitutional guarantees with regard to equality, and the legalization of the same by voters through ballot initiatives and referendums.
As indicated by Zastrow and Kirst-Ashman, , there are a wide variety of cons raised towards encouraging the achievement for gay marriage legalization. The first dimension is the fact that gay marriage fundamentally undermines most of the family values because the concept of marriage is diverse and it is upon each of them to develop their individual dimensions as man or woman.
Not legitimizing same-sex marriage will be an express illustration of denial of the basic human rights. This argument promoting the aspect of gay marriage is on the fact that each human being has a profound right of living the way they want to. They have fundamental rights of choosing their sexuality, their partners, as well as the family they want to build. Some of the other pros of legalizing gay marriage is the fact that it will be one of the basic building blocks of the nation and its neighborhood.
Increasingly, the basic social aspects of equality state that all persons are equally created p. Therefore, preventing homosexuals from getting married will not necessarily increase the levels of heterosexual marriages.
In this line, the prevention of homosexuals from getting married will as well not cause due increment in the procreation levels among the heterosexual couples. White argues that most countries have granted equal rights to all marginalized communities and women and homosexuals will be next in line.
Having this in mind, people will heavily suggest legalizing gay marriages as any efforts to the contrary will have the government denying basic human rights to the gay population. Amending the constitution to favor gay marriages will be particularly beneficial to gays and the society in general.
People proposing gay marriages hold the opinion that legalizing them has very many benefits for both the ones leading gay lifestyles and the society as a whole. They also proclaim that gay couples getting married will not rampantly indulge in a number of extramarital affairs for those who are simply living together in the exception of marriages.
Zastrow and Kirst-Ashman add that legalization of gay marriage will be critical in sending out positive signals to various societies which marriages need to be based only on love.
Increasingly, the perception is that gay couples cannot naturally procreate and they will most likely adopt children. This gives plenty of orphaned children a more comfortable and loving home set up that they can utilize.
One of the contentious issues is that it continues to be legalized in most parts of world. By subsequent state governments, the pros and cons of gay marriage are currently under contemplation.
Looking into the way that things are progressing with such social issues, there are still long waits before having the same sex partners having rights of living as respectfully as the rest of the heterosexuals in the world. Clearly, the denial of such rights will squarely fit as a religious freedom violation for both civil and religious marriages being classified as separate institutions.
Marriage benefits like joint ownership as well as medical decision-making capacity are made well available across all couples. Homosexuality is an accepted lifestyle in the modern day with most evidence offering strong support towards the biological causation. In addition, denying such marriages will be categorized as minority discrimination.
Furthermore, the same sex marriages do not directly hurt society or individuals in particular. This means that the only thing which needs to be taken into consideration in such a marriage is love p. Wolfson , argues that a number of criticisms have been raised against the issue of marriage amongst homosexuals.
This is because it is particularly detrimental to the overall marriage institution. This argument is raised against gay marriage on the grounds that if they will be legalized, the marriage institution will adversely lose its significance. Initially, marriages are perceived to be solemnized based on the human race continuity.
Both men and women are bound through marriage for the purposes of procreation only. Amending the constitution to make gay marriages legitimate will offer all the wrong signals to the generations in the future who constantly perceive marriages between men and women unnecessary in raising children. Proponents and gays movement fight for legal right to marriage in order to ensure that all citizens enjoy full human rights.
Many religions also view same sex marriages as immoral and if gays and lesbians are legalized the church would be offended since marriage is an institution supposed to be holy and ordained by God. For that reason allowing same sex marriage means violation of the sanctity of marriage. There exists harmful consequences if gay and lesbian couples are not recognized in the society. The main challenges same sex marriages face include inability to participate in medical decisions that involve their partner who are dying, lack of right to own common property and exclusion from employment benefits.
Opponents also fear that if gay marriages are recognized the society is more likely to accept same sex relationships as moral. The traditional definition of marriage is valuable and the society should define it as the only marriage and legitimize it.
Gay marriages are the eventual rejection of objective reality where an environment of going against the norm is created therefore; it is upon the government to decide whether to legalize this marriages or not Larocque In Canada same sex marriages is legal.
Advocates of gay marriages describe marriage between a man and a woman as a weakened institution that divides the society by sex. On the other hand, they sum up same sex marriages as private, intimate and emotional relationship where two people unite for their own personal reasons in order to enhance their personal well-up. Socially many people think that gay marriages are not acceptable therefore the couples should not have the right to get married.
In some countries such as Canada, there is dramatic progress to acknowledge the rights of gays and lesbians. Court battles have been filed and to some extent gays and lesbians have succeeded in obtaining some degree of social recognition Staver 5. The gay movement argument for same sex marriage is basically founded on the norm of formal equality. They argue that the state needs to accord the gays the same legal options as other different sex couples enjoy.
This includes the right and duties required in civil marriage. Economic benefits that the proponents of gay marriages cite include increased revenue as a result of additional marriages through marriage taxes Stockland For a long time the culture of men and women marrying each other in the society has been established globally. Two men or women marrying therefore have resulted to a controversy where people have differing opinions. Same sex marriages cannot have children.
The debate for this issue of same sex marriage has existed for many years and a gay right movement was established in America during the s. Getting married is a decision which is personal and private. The controversy brought by gay marriages includes changing the norm of marriage and challenges in existing laws and religious traditions. Many religions in the world object to the issue of gay marriages on the grounds of morality.
Churches base on their beliefs of what is wrong or right on scriptures which are holy writings. The church believes that allowing the gay couples to adopt children would be an injustice as the children will lack the proper moral upbringing. Opponents of gay marriages cite the increased social costs such as healthcare thus affecting the economy.
Those against this kind of marriage think that same sex couples should not be allowed to adopt children. The opponents are generally concerned about the harmful effect gay marriages would have on the society in case of legalization. They believe that the family institution is protected through heterosexual marriage whose main aim is to procreate.
Free gay marriage papers, essays, and research papers.
Essays - largest database of quality sample essays and research papers on Argumentative Essay On Gay Marriage.
Unlike most editing & proofreading services, we edit for everything: grammar, spelling, punctuation, idea flow, sentence structure, & more. Get started now! Essay on Gay Marriage Words | 7 Pages. Gay marriage is a very talked about topic in are country that shouldn’t be ignored. I believe men and women should be able to love freely and not be shamed by it.
gay marriage Essay. GAY MARRIAGE Ask just about anyone. They will all tell you they're in favor of equal rights for homosexuals. Just name the situation, and ask. Should there be a constitutional amendment that allows gays and lesbians to legally marry? Find out how to write a gay marriage essay answering the topic.