Doctors, scientists, politicians and representatives of different confessions discuss the possibility of legitimating euthanasia. Various countries take opposite sides and either allow euthanasia or prohibit it. However, I would like to support euthanasia and, with the help of this paper, to argue in favor of it. It is necessary to note that there are several types of euthanasia.
Passive euthanasia is already widespread in hospitals and is nothing but the impossibility to cure a person and attempts to alleviate the sufferings with the help of narcotics or the cessation of therapy because of its futility. While passive euthanasia is legally used in hospitals, the application of non-aggressive euthanasia is constantly debated. In the case when the euthanasia may be voluntary, I would like to highlight the human right to be in charge of their life.
Sick bedridden people are already bereft of all rights; they feel a burden for their relatives. Humble and disabled, they want at least to leave this world peacefully and to die with dignity. Even criminals have a right for their last wish; frankly speaking, it is our duty to fulfill the last wish of sick patients. So, thus we incite them to a great sin and crime. Besides, a man is created for life, and all of us have the instinct of self-preservation, only people driven to despair by their disease, can ask for death and it is their right.
It is necessary to realize how horrible it is to live, being conscious of the forthcoming death. Most people cannot overcome this pressure and lose the sense of life, burdening their own life and the life of their relatives as well. In cases of inability of patients to express their will, euthanasia is also possible and is justified.
Then the decision should be taken by the relatives, who are responsible for that. Often it is obvious that the patient is doomed to death and has no chances to survive.
Still, relatives have to provide all necessary medicines and to pay for places in hospital. Many families spend their last money on the treatment that is vain. Another possible reason for the justifying of euthanasia is the lack of space in hospitals for those who can be cured and saved.
It is bitter to acknowledge it, but this problem exists in many countries. Those who want to live have no chance to get the proper treatment and care while those who want to die cannot give their place to them.
In fact, I suppose the greatest problem of this controversial point is the inability of the government to implement a thoroughly made law that can foresee all the possible problems of the legalization of euthanasia and avoid them. To make a conclusion, I am sure that euthanasia has the right to exist in our society. Next to the facts, to provide medical professionals with the legal right to kill, even in limited circumstances, are unreasonable and dangerous.
Using this right, people can hide medical negligence or ill treatment. Such precedents have already been in European countries, where euthanasia is legalized. The eleventh against proclaims that children can push their parents so that they take advantage of the new service.
Such cases were recorded in the United States and Europe. The twelfth fact explains that those who advocate the legalization of euthanasia ignore the fact that people may be under pressure and use this service for various reasons. As a thirteenth against, there is a point that there is little discussion about how the final stage of euthanasia should be carried out.
So-called precautionary measures have been illusory or ineffective in all jurisdictions where euthanasia is legalized. It is known that many feel great relief if their suicide attempt was unsuccessful, but anyone can not question the victims of euthanasia or regret their decision. Moreover, suicide for assistance is based on a secular principle. After death, nothing is possible; suicide does not affect anything.
It is very arrogant. If, as Christians believe and practically all of Western civilization up until recently , life after death exists, suicide is an act with enormous moral consequences. Also, suicide for assistance as a moral issue has never been discussed, even on the periphery. The sixteenth against proclaims that abuse of euthanasia occurs wherever it is legal.
For example, judges in the Netherlands have allowed some families to subject their elderly parents with dementia to euthanasia, despite the fact that the parents themselves have never asked for euthanasia and there was no weighty evidence that they wanted to die. Nevertheless, the elderly person reflects and decides independently.
What is more, their close people and relatives are trying to resist the choice of a person to commit suicide. It is worthy to note that older people are much better informed, more autonomous and self-confident than before and called for not underestimating the experience and qualifications of those who help to get out of life.
Also, in countries, where legalization of euthanasia exists, the prices for this service increase. In Belgium and the Netherlands every year, a huge number of people die as a result of euthanasia. The eighteenth against implies specialists in ethics insist that forced euthanasia or rather a murder for children should be legalized.
In the Netherlands, this has already happened Jotkowitz, A B. What is more, suicide for help and euthanasia devalue human life. After all, medical institutions are killing a suffering person as if a domestic animal was slaughtering. The last but not the least is where the suicide with assistance is legalized, activists of euthanasia push this service into all possible spheres. Their words about some kind of precautionary measures and limited circumstances are an outright lie.
The ultimate goal is to provide euthanasia upon the request and without any kind of apology. It can be said that the only minus of euthanasia is its gloomy coloring in society. It always sprawls on religious dogmas, which can not but offend the feelings of unbelievers who are hungry for it day by day. Also, people are gently saying strange and useless analogies to the past with the naturalness of death and anguish, utterances like one must live Piccirilli Dorsey, Inc.
The public was obsessed with the cult of life as an absolute good and lost any culture of death. Suicide is not savagery. This is nothing but a public opinion that still can not support euthanasia with even half of its votes. To sum up everything that was mentioned above, one should admit that the problem of euthanasia requires criminal legal regulation. As the solution to this, the fate of many hopelessly sick people, who in recent years have been in hospitals, whose physical condition is diagnosed as an intermediate one, between life and death, and the mental one, is helplessness, a state of deep despair.
Retrieved 29 August , from http: Retrieved 29 August, , from http: Retrieved 29 August Retrieved 29 August , from https: The Association, ; Document Number Your email address will not be published.
Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email. Get access to the list of our best samples for free. We divided them into categories of various types of papers and disciplines for your convenience. Get your writing assignment done in 4 simple steps 1 Fill in order details Submit your instructions to writers for free! Start receiving proposals from writers.
Writing Tips Writing your euthanasia research paper would be more difficult for you than a simple essay. Advantages and Disadvantages The intention to deliberately accelerate the death of an incurable patient, even to stop his suffering, has never been unambiguous. Order Now Submit your instructions to writers for free.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Get free study materials Samples. Send me the link. Follow us Essayshark on Facebook. Essayshark on Google Plus. Essayshark on Twitter Tweet.
Euthanasia term papers (paper ) on Euthanasia Outline: The Argument over Euthanasia I. What is euthanasia? A. ¡§good death¡¨- greek B. intentional termination of life by another by explic. Term paper
WORKING OUTLINE I. Introduction A. Euthanasia is defined as a “good and painless death” B. Active Euthanasia, Passive Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide or Mercy Killing are the different kinds of euthanasia that .
View Notes - Research Paper Outline from POSC at Texas Christian University. Should Euthanasia or Physician Assisted Suicide be legalized in the United States? I. Introduction A. Story %(22). Euthanasia Research Paper: Writing Tips. Writing your euthanasia research paper would be more difficult for you than a simple essay. Nevertheless, if you know the structure and know what to do in each part of your research, nothing is impossible!
Read this essay on Euthanasia Persuasive Outline. Come browse our large digital warehouse of free sample essays. Get the knowledge you need in order to pass your classes and more. Only at ovaren.cf". Oct 21, · Research Paper Thursday, October 21, outline Clair Moulder. Sollenberger. English 21 October Outline: Euthanasia Thesis: Life is meant to be a beautiful, joyful experience, and once these enjoyable aspects of life have ceased, the will to live diminishes.